Text

franiel32 reblogged your post AS WE RECKONED, FUNDAMENTALISTS SEEK T… and added:

The title of this post really is an unfair portrayal of Creationism…

Your right. I’ve changed the title. However, I disagree with your sentiments about the Roman and Anglican Churches. In both cases, the church hierarchy are the root of the offense against LGBT persons. -EM

Tags: franiel32
Photo
AS WE RECKONED, FUNDAMENTALISTS SEEK TO USE CREATIONISM IN ANTI-LGBT TACTIC
Earlier we reckoned that Creationism was to be seen as important to the Fundamentalist anti-LGBT tactic. Staff geologist for Creationist Ken Ham confirms this.

“The homosexual issue flows from this. Genesis says that God created marriage between one man and one woman. He didn’t create it between two men, or two women, or two men and one woman, or three men and one woman, or two women and one man, or three women and one man. If other parts of Genesis aren’t true, then how could this idea of marriage be true? If there were no Adam and Eve and we’re all evolved from apelike ancestors and there’s homosexuality in the animal world and if Genesis is mythology, then you can justify any behavior you want.” —Terry Mortenson

A literal reading of Genesis is an important part of fundamentalist Christianity. From it, they derive a number of socially ultra-conservative stances. 

AS WE RECKONED, FUNDAMENTALISTS SEEK TO USE CREATIONISM IN ANTI-LGBT TACTIC

Earlier we reckoned that Creationism was to be seen as important to the Fundamentalist anti-LGBT tactic. Staff geologist for Creationist Ken Ham confirms this.

“The homosexual issue flows from this. Genesis says that God created marriage between one man and one woman. He didn’t create it between two men, or two women, or two men and one woman, or three men and one woman, or two women and one man, or three women and one man. If other parts of Genesis aren’t true, then how could this idea of marriage be true? If there were no Adam and Eve and we’re all evolved from apelike ancestors and there’s homosexuality in the animal world and if Genesis is mythology, then you can justify any behavior you want.” —Terry Mortenson

A literal reading of Genesis is an important part of fundamentalist Christianity. From it, they derive a number of socially ultra-conservative stances. 

(Source: soundgecko.com)

Photo
TEACH US TO PRAY | 3.
Make Me an Instrument of Your Peace Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.Where there is hatred, let me sow love,Where there is injury, pardonWhere there is doubt, faith,Where there is despair, hope,Where there is darkness, light,Where there is sadness, joy.O Divine Master, grant that I may not so muchseek to be consoled as to console,not so much to be understood as to understand,not so much to be loved, as to love;for it is in giving that we receive,it is in pardoning that we are pardoned,it is in dying that we awake to eternal life.—- St. Francis of Assisi

TEACH US TO PRAY | 3.

Make Me an Instrument of Your Peace 

Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.
Where there is hatred, let me sow love,
Where there is injury, pardon
Where there is doubt, faith,
Where there is despair, hope,
Where there is darkness, light,
Where there is sadness, joy.
O Divine Master, grant that I may not so much
seek to be consoled as to console,
not so much to be understood as to understand,
not so much to be loved, as to love;
for it is in giving that we receive,
it is in pardoning that we are pardoned,
it is in dying that we awake to eternal life.

—- St. Francis of Assisi

Text

waterkid72 reblogged your post anonymous said:I just thought of … and added:

I prefer to refer to God as He because that is how it has been done in Scripture. However I do like to use female imagery

There is feminine imagery in the Bible, like this:

Luke 13:34 (NRSV) Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing!

Text

instantmonkeysonline replied to your post: anonymous said:I just thought of …

I don’t know why singular They hasn’t caught on as a pronoun for God. Gender-neutral AND trinity all in one.

Maybe because it would sound too polytheistic, like there’s more than one God?

Text

radicalchristianity replied to your post: anonymous said:I just thought of …

I like to use She/Her pronouns, but I’ll use He/Him/His every now and then. Since I’m made in God’s image, I don’t want to have to leave my physical body to relate to that, if that makes sense?

Yes, it makes sense that female of feminine-identifying persons would relate to referring to God as she. I’m a man, but I’m also androgynous, so it doesn’t matter to me.

Text

Anonymous said: I came across a Christian blog that basically said "we should love gay people even if they aren't living exactly as God wants because, well, who is?" and it really irked me. I think this kind of language is even more dangerous than outright condemnation, personally. Thoughts?

image

Yeah, that type of comment always unsettles me too, because it’s extremely patronizing. They still feel the same way about us, cherish no delusion. But they can’t be as openly critical because it’s increasingly no longer acceptable. As with racism, sexism, and ableism, heterosexism now becomes much more subtle and wrapped in a cute package. Know this and recognize it when you see it. —Enrique

Tags: Anonymous
Text

Anonymous said: I just thought of something: why do we always refer to God as a "he"? Do we really know for sure what God's gender is (or if God actually has a gender)?

image

It is commonly accepted that God is genderless. In much of the Church, we’re discussing how we refer to God. For some people it helps to refer to God as Mother; I have to admit that I almost had a stroke the first time my female priest suggested this, but now I realize that was silly of me. It’s just language we use to relate God to ourselves. Also some people refer to the Trinity in abstract terms such as Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer of Life. As far as pronouns, I seldom use them when referring to God. I say God’s or Godself.

This is a conversation we’ll have for a while to come. I encourage you all to share your thoughts on it. -Enrique

Photo
When I came across this image, it broke my heart, for many reasons. It’s
nice to be thought of as sacred though, isn’t it? When so many people of
faith tell us we aren’t.

When I came across this image, it broke my heart, for many reasons. It’s
nice to be thought of as sacred though, isn’t it? When so many people of
faith tell us we aren’t.

Text

jessemarinus replied to your photoset “Wow, these run the spectrum from outright condemning to having rainbow…”

Here in the Netherlands we don’t have a lot of activist against homosexuality, so the media doesn’t know about it. The religious families here don’t talk about it. Most of the gays here are against religion, so religious people are against them.

I see. In the US, you know who’s your friend and who’s your foe, because they make it pretty clear, And while LGBT Americans are more unchurched than non-LGBT Americans, there are many LGBT people of faith too! I hope you will be a voice to bridge this divide in your country. It will not be easy, but God is calking us to do it.